Texas has criminalized barratry since 1876. Citing legal dictionary definitions, courts in Texas have stated generally that barratry is the “vexatious incitement to litigation, especially by soliciting potential legal clients,” or “the offense of . . . exciting and stirring up quarrels and suits, either at law or otherwise.” Those vague descriptions say little and could apply to most forms of permissible lawyer advertising, solicitation, and marketing.
In Texas, at least, the better approach to ascertain the meaning of barratry is probably to examine the “functional definitions” in the Texas Penal Code.
In 2011 the Texas Legislature amended Tex. Gov’t Code § 82.065 and added § 82.0651. Those statutory changes strengthened civil remedies for clients and created a new civil remedy for nonclients who are subjected to solicitation that violates laws or disciplinary rules regarding barratry.Barratry issues can arise in a variety of legal settings, including fee disputes, association of counsel, motions to disqualify, and lawyer discipline cases. Herring & Panzer counsels clients regarding barratry issues in each of these types of matters. The firm can provide advice to clients who have been a victim of barratry, as well as lawyers who may face their own allegations of barratry.
Two principal Texas Penal Code sections address barratrous conduct: § 38.12 and § 38.18.
Section 38.12 of the Texas Penal Code is the key barratry prohibition. It is entitled “Barratry and the Solicitation of Professional Employment” and defines three categories of criminal offenses, each of which has multiple subcategories.
Chuck Herring has testified as an expert witness for the State of Texas in a rare, successful criminal prosecution of a lawyer for the crime of barratry.
The first category of criminal offenses has subcategories that focus on (a) unauthorized claims; (b) solicitation; and (c) paying or transferring value to obtain employment. Specifically, the first prohibition provides that a person commits an offense if, with “intent to obtain economic benefit,” the person:
The second category of offenses focuses on financing the foregoing activities, or knowingly accepting employment based on such prohibited solicitation. Specifically, it creates criminal liability for a person who:
An exception to § 38.12(a) or (b) exists if the “conduct is authorized by the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct or any rule of court.”
Section 82.0651 provides that a contract for legal services is voidable by the client if it is “procured as a result of conduct violating Section 38.12(a) or (b), Penal Code, or Rule 7.03 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. . . .”
Under the statute, even if a contract is declared void for barratry, an “innocent” lawyer may still obtain a quantum meruit recovery if the client does not prove the lawyer committed barratry or knew of the barratry “before undertaking the representation,” and the lawyer reported the barratrous misconduct to the disciplinary authorities unless (a) someone else already did or (b) the lawyer reasonably believed reporting would “substantially prejudice” the client.
In addition to providing that the contract is voidable by the client, the statute allows a client to recover the following from any person who has committed barratry: